There is a certain gap in socialist thinking, and I've never understood—despite a lifetime of reading leftist authors and identifying personally with the left—exactly how it is supposed to be bridged. Simply put, it's the familiar problem of "incentives."
Historically, most socialist governments have arisen in underdeveloped countries that want to industrialize. Elected socialists have not been willing to accept an equality of poverty and call it socialism.
All week long I've been complaining on this blog about leftists who strangely feel the need to make excuses for Putin—even though the Russian autocrat does not himself identify in any visible way with the Left, and even though the global far-right (viz. Tucker, e.g.) have meanwhile embraced Putin's regime as one of their own.
And lo, as soon as I was ranting about this phenomenon, it was back in the headlines yesterday. The victory of Darializa Avila Chevalier in New York's House Democratic primaries has drawn attention to some of her old controversial Tweets. One of them, which was still raising eyebrows this week, came from the start of the 2022 Ukraine war.
I spent a whole morning earlier this week arguing on this blog with a podcast by a group of Putin apologists. I know already that some people reading this will skim through it and say: "Why bother? Why waste your breath on a bunch of 'Russian disinformation'"?
But that seems a bit glib. And it occurs to me that this is the reason why pro-Putin propaganda tends to stick, and why it continues to exert a strange allure for parts of the Left—even long after the Russian government has ceased to identify itself in any way with the Left, and even after the global neo-fascist right has embraced Putin's cause as their own.
Trump's bombing of Iran was a flagrantly illegal act of aggression that was bound to blow up in his face, and lo, that's exactly what happened. Trump deserved to have his ass handed to him in this war, in short. And so, there are moments when one can almost feel a sneaking appreciation for the Islamic Republic of Iran—if only for teaching him such an obvious yet apparently much-needed lesson.
As a correction to this tendency, it's healthy to remind ourselves every few days that the Islamic Republic is still a brutal theocracy that regularly hangs, tortures, and flogs its own citizens. They are not the good guys here, even if hauling off and attacking them in violation of the UN Charter was not a moral, lawful, helpful, or prudent way to respond to their misdeeds.
The Supreme Court released five opinions today—none of which was among the most high-profile and closely-watched cases of the remaining term. Nevertheless, they were quite revealing in their own way about the state of our legal system.
Four of the five decisions today were issued with 6-3 partisan splits. And three of the five dealt in some manner with the question of who is and who is not immune to a lawsuit.
In just the first six months of this year, Trump has started two baseless wars of aggression on opposite sides of the globe—in both cases against admittedly authoritarian governments that the administration claims to disapprove of.
You might think, among all this needless carnage, that one possible silver lining might be that the U.S. would at least make common cause with Venezuelan and Iranian dissidents and political prisoners, in whose name these wars were ostensibly fought. Weren't we going in to "liberate" the people from their oppressive governments, after all?
I was listening to a podcast on a road trip this weekend that broadly aligns with the "alt-left"/"dirtbag left" school of thought. There has never been a great single all-encompassing name for these people (John Ganz has called them the "anti-alarmist" left, since they tend to reject comparisons of MAGA to fascism), but you know the type I mean.
Many of them emerged out of the great crusade against Bush-era neoconservatism (in which they were on the right side), but sometime around 2014 or so, they seem to have concluded that because they were against America's abuses of power, they must be for Putin's and the PRC's.
